. '''To Software''' '''[[Software|Software]]''' - '''To Software-Assessment - ''' '''[[Software/Assessment|Software/Assessment]]''' - '''To [[Software/Assessment/20111018-S-A-MiniTOP|previous meeting]]''' - '''To [[Software/Assessment/20111101-S-A-MiniTOP|next meeting]]'''
----
= Minutes of the MiniTOP on the 2011-10-25 =
== Setting ==
The MiniTOP will be held via telco 22:00 CEST
Attendees: Marcus, Uli, dirk, sven, Michael
== Topics ==
(skip to agenda)
Action items from last meeting '''[[Software/Assessment/ActionItems|Meeting Action Items]]'''
== Agenda ==
1. [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=976|bug #976]] - database restructure preperation
* raw transcript from meeting results: [[https://bugs.cacert.org/file_download.php?file_id=245&type=bug|sql structure modifications as discussed within meeting]]
* New table to add: high potential domains to secure (mozilla blue print)
* proposed testserver deployment - when ?
* results from meeting 2011-10-18
* deletedwhen - to rename to deleted type datetime
* from - to rename to creatorid
* enum - or not enum for cca method
* add table "mozilla blue print" domains
* proposal michael: to add this as file, also to deploy to signer
* sql update? or php script?
* adding versioning number ? table verno, when type datetime
* new infos from this week:
* email addresses + domains verification on cert renewal: last verified (type datetime)
* info from dirk regarding CCA table structure. structure defined in [[https://lists.cacert.org/wws/arc/cacert-devel/2009-06/msg00004.html]]. Current definition to compare with structure definition from mid 2009
* Update?
1. The List of open / running / unhandled bugs - Part I
1. [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=827|bug #827]] patch
|| Dirk, Michael || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=827|bug #827]] and [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=959|bug #959]] Thawte patch/Points-Count-Order-Change project || related bug 959: needs 1 more test, needs 2nd review / 2nd review: also check -x / tests done, needs 2nd review<
>959 {g} reviewed, deployed <
>827 {g} reviewed, deployment in 2 steps<
>deployed, report from Wytze || {g} <
> {0} ||
* dirk needs results from arbitration [[https://wiki.cacert.org/Arbitrations/a20100822.1|a20100822.1]] request to magu
1. dirk sent update 2011-10-18: michael transfered to testserver
* michael: sql injection of one notary record: date < 30.8.2006, awarded=0, points=35
* test: 10.php: 35 points, 15.php shows 0 points => bug not fixed
* problem was reported by Hans, needs to be fixed: awarded = 0, points = 35, assurance date < 1.9.2006
* there still exist 2 notary table records for test purposes to check this bug
|| script || 10.php || 15.php || 43old || 43new ||
|| assuree's view<
>assurances received || 35 pts {g} || 35 pts {g} || 35 pts {g} || 35 pts {g} ||
|| assurer's view<
>assurances given || 35 pts {g} || 0 pts {r} || 35 pts {g} || 0 pts {r} ||
1. New proposal: scripted mailing for 0:0 F2F cases with detailed instructions
1. get information how many 0:0 cass we have ?
* info from last years arbitration [[Arbitrations/a20100822.1|a20100822.1]] ? (documentation is not yet avail)
* Lambert as Arbitrator, Martin as Case Manager and dirk in role as SA as Claimant should know the answer
1. is it possible to update 15.php script to signal the 0:0 F2F assurance cases ?!? eg by color blue or background color light yellow ?
* dirk: 15.php can be easily upgraded - not only color also italic
1. to prepare an arbitration process for a scripted mailing announcement
a. to the assuree's who may loose points caused by 0:0 cases
a. to the assurers, who can re-apply their assurance over assuree's with the 0:0 problem
1. arbitration initiated
1. wiki faq created: [[FAQ/NewPointsCount#YellowLines]]
1. PR work - Update?
1. newsletter mailing: ok from board [[https://community.cacert.org/board/motions.php?motion=m20111016.2|m20111016.2]] and [[https://community.cacert.org/board/motions.php?motion=m20111023.2|m20111023.2]]
1. newsletter reviewed English revision [[PR/News/NewPointsCalculation]]
1. translations in progress
1. script sql query to prepare based on events/oa mailing
* request for statement by critical team
* proposal by critical team:
a. to pace the email sending out a bit, e.g. by doing a chunk of 1000, then waiting 19 minutes (by a programmatic sleep) before starting the next chunk of 1000 etc
a. pushing out the whole mailing will take somewhere between one and two full days
a. reduce Postfix' maximal_queue_lifetime from the default 5 days to say 2 days
a. Basically [[Arbitrations/a20100309.1|a20100309.1]] already gives permission for this mailing, except that it outlines a somewhat different technical implementation of such mailings. But policy-wise there doesn't seem to be a difference to me with what we are proposing here, so why bother with addtl arbitration?
1. Software-Assessors / developers to prepare a sql-query that can handle above requirements, also to handle localy translateded text
* script to use from events + OA mailing, SA's to build a sql query, sending to critical team
1. Questions from last 5 meetings:
* dirk: when will 827 goes to production ?
1. Michaels workqueue
1. Translingo
[[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=985|bug #985]]
. [[https://translations.cacert.org]] ([[http://translations.cacert.org/]]) (replacement for translingo)
. the translingo.cacert.org had been in operation far longer, so I think it is possible that some users migrated to translingo.cacert.org, without telling us.
. I would suggest to mass-mail the email addresses of the translation-project leaders in the translingo database, to inform them, and to ask them to speak up if they still need it
* last foreign uploads 2008 on about 13 + cacert projects
* whohas translingo server console access?
* mario
* req for console access for michael to contact project leaders, Updates?
* Transfer In, Transfer Out problems
* Update from new deployment ?
* opened for: create an account can now be started
* Michael current state:
* import and export routine works
* script to incorporate updates needs fixed
* next: complete language handling needs to be updated
* accept lang handler needs fix
* FF de, de_de
* IE 6 de, 8,9 de_de
* working session within last meeting: michael, marcus
* infos from meeting 2011-10-18
* pdf code needs rewrite (uni code library, move to external server (outsourcing))
* message cert notification - uses perl code, text source not avail (get bind-text-domain)
* current state?
1. New function to TMS - edit notary table record
* [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=980|bug #980]]
* infos from last meeting
* testers needs editing individual notary records: fields "method", "awarded", "points"
* easier to create notary records with testserver (add F2F), and edit existing record, doesn't need to check for assurer-from, assuree-to and so on
* Update?
1. Dirks workqueue - The List of open / running / unhandled bugs
1. VBscript for Vista/Win7 (select keysize >= 1024) - '''reminder''' to dirk
|| x^1^ Dirk, new [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=964|bug#964]]<
>DEV: [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=918|bug#918 (Part II)]] ([[Arbitrations/a20110312.1|a20110312.1]]) Weak keys: /pages/account/.. 4.php, 17.php to combine ? (/includes/keygen.php) '''DEV''' || current state: test /account/4.php added to testserver<
>Marcus will do detailed tests on Wed<
>some references added to [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=964|bug#964]] || {-} ||
* as part of
* x^1^ Arbitration case [[Arbitrations/a20110312.1|a20110312.1]] Weak keys [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=918|bug #918]] / [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=954|bug #954]] / [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=964|bug#964]]
* Current state:
|| {g} || pre mailing sent ||
|| {g} || keys revocation script to bulk revoke weak keys, new [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=954|bug #954]], finished ||
|| {-} || dirk: DEV: [[Arbitrations/a20110312.1|a20110312.1]] [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=918|bug#918]] Weak keys: /pages/account/.. 4.php, 17.php to combine ? (/includes/keygen.php) '''DEV''' <
>vbscript needs to be improved with select box key size and lower limit to 2048 (based on [[https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:MD5and1024]])<
>Api CertEnroll (MS crypto provider)<
>new [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=964|bug#964]]<
>current state: test /account/4.php added to testserver<
>Marcus will do detailed tests on Wed<
>some references added to [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=964|bug#964]] ||
|| {g} || Weak keys blog post, published ||
|| {g} || Weak keys article published by Hanno(July 28), link is in CAcert's blog post (July 30) ||
|| {b} || weak keys: problems with cryptostick (to test at [[events/FrOSCon2011|Froscon]] with Juergen ?) ||
* cert enroll infos under [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=964|bug#964]]
* vista and win7 works with other engine !CryptoAPI (?) => Cryptography API: Next Generation
* [[http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa833130%28v=VS.85%29.aspx]]
* Marcus: added notes for Win7 [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=964#c2249]]
* Update (5th week) ?
* dirk: has not started the virtual machine
* Question from Marcus: did someone contacted illuminat?
* No, Marcus: to contact illuminat
* Update?
1. Advertising
1. Prepare Advertising fix for testserver - '''reminder''' to dirk
|| Dirk || Advertising (from last board meeting), [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=958|bug #958]] || add changes as discussed in last meeting to testserver || {0} ||
* [[CAcertInc/LogosForSale/Rules]] wiki link exist
* "buy me" logo / "Logo For Sale" logo / "Monthly Auction on Logos" logo
* Logos and Links exist, needs deployment to testserver
* Update (6th week) ?
1. Bugs rejected in review 2
|| 2 || uli, ted || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=794|bug #794]] || visibility over certificates for sysadm in account administration, new update 2011-09-24 || {-} || ? / u1 / m1 ||
* shorten ttl for certs on testserver modification?
* update?
|| 9 || uli || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=823|bug #823]] email address removal fix || No warning when removing e-mail adres from acount that certificates will be revoked<
>checked by 4, needs 2nd review, deploy || {-} || ? / u9 / m9||
* update?
1. Bugs to Review #1, transfer to testserver - Currently '''4'''
|| uli || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=977|bug #977]] admin console text fix || admin console Sysadmin - find domain - lists 2 tables - one for user accounts, one for org accounts, naming issue || {0} ||
|| uli || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=967|bug #967]] OA isassurer check || Give an OA the oppertuntiy to check if a desiginated Organisation Admininistrator is a CAcert assurer || {0} ||
|| uli || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=859|bug #859]] admin console interface || feature request: show activity on an account in the admin interface, new update /!\ || {0} ||
|| inopiae || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=981|bug #981]] OA overview (dupe of [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=943|bug #943]]) || New layout of view for Organisation Administraors in account/id35 || {0} ||
1. Bugs under testing: - Currently '''4'''
|| || neo || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=985|bug #985]] move translingo to translations || check language settings under testserver || {0} || ||
|| || inopiae || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=920|bug #920]] Join - single name only (eg Indonesian) || details under bug number || {0} || ||
|| || uli || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=855|bug #855]] admin console interface "unknown" + "empty" assurance method fields, needed for correct testing on testserver || admin console lists "empty" and "Unknown" assurance types on listing given Assurances || {0} || ||
|| 3 || Dirk || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=894|bug#894]] assure someone patches (checkbox) || (incl wot.php changes)<
>tested by 2, needs 2nd review, deploy<
>new test round || {0} || ? / u1 / m1 ||
1. Needs 2nd review + transfer to Critical team, to bundle, to deploy - Currently '''4 (!!!)'''
* define priority eg. 10,2, and so on
* proposed order: from 1 to 10
|| 5 || uli, ted || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=968|bug #968]] error logging cleanup (splitted bug #909) || split 0000909: too many error messages logged - part II - general.php<
>create certs,certs,certs<
>2 sessions: 2011-09-21 + 2011-09-25<
>more tests needed<
>create certs,certs,certs,certs<
>create client, server, gpg keys, org client and server certs || {0} || ? / u4 / m5||
|| 7 || uli, ted || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=789|bug #789]] OA edit domain fix || Editing domain for organisations does not work<
>new update 2011-09-26 || {0} || ? / u7 / m7||
|| 8 || Ted, uli || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=957|bug #957]] Resize the comment field on [[https://secure.cacert.org/account.php?id=27]] so more information is visible || last update 2011-08-19<
>tested 3 times<
>ready to deploy? || {0} || ? / u8 / m8 ||
|| 10 || uli, Ted || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=965|bug #965]] 0000965: Outsource / fix Webdb text pages id=12, 13 || addtl. id=37, id=38, new update 2011-09-25 || {0} || ? / u10 / m10 ||
* #1 reviewed and transfered by Michael within meeting
1. Needs development, deployment, discussion
1. [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=835|bug #835]] Migrate CATS onto testserver
|| [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=835|bug #835]] Assurer challenge (on testserver) || asssigned to Ted, CATS to install on ca-mgr1, awaiting deployment || {0} ||
1. [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=943|bug #943]] change OA admin/assurer text
|| [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=943|bug #943]] change OA admin/assurer text || -> Ted, rejected, needs comment from OAO || {-} ||
* webdb names OrgAdmins as OrgAssurers and names OrgAssurers as OrgAdmins.
* patch takes account about this issue
* problem with menu link Org Admin .. is Org Assurers menu
* but this menu includes one addtl. link "View" that is available for Org Admins
* and Org Admins with master flag to add new admins
* master flag is not described in OAP (!)
* addtl master flag to revoke ?
* rename to "Org Administration"
* don't show menu to OrgAdmins
* dupe bug# 981
1. [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=824|bug #824]] Org User cert fix
|| uli, Ted || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=824|bug #824]] Org User cert fix || Organisation User Certificates: Need UI improvement for proper production usage<
>working session: needs to be removed from testserver, done<
>Case study || {0} ||
1. [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=988|bug #988]] TTP cap form deployment
|| uli || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=988|bug #988]] TTP cap form deployment || Case study || {0} ||
1. strategy plans ... next: strategy for "New Roots & Escrow"
1. idea: using indirect crl's ?
* 2 crl's needed, one valid, one invalid crl server
* more infos available ? who ?
1. build testserver with special certs
1. Magu, Michael to send instructions for test deployment
* indirect CRL: RFC 5280 [[http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280]] (chapter 5)
* meetings ago we've defined Testing requirements and a potential testszenario
* to remind every meeting
* Michael: testserver environment deployment
1. policy group: define requirements
* multimember escrow method ?
* needs risk analyze
* potential candidates ?
* Marcus to contacted Benedikt, will contact Thomas K
* Next step(s)
1. how does debian work ?
* defered to Froscon (end of Aug), CCCcamp (around Aug 10th)
1. CI (Update)
1. [[http://live.eclipse.org/node/1031|description to eclipse testpage]], [[http://adobedev.adobe.acrobat.com/p4101brizwr/|Webinar]]
* deployment scenario:
1. create testusers
1. testing
1. delete testusers
* regression test for standard tests: eg 0,1,49,50,51,99,100,101 pts w/ and w/o CATS passed
* reminder
1. Jubula Test-Tool (by Michael) - update?
* [[http://www.eclipse.org/jubula/download.php]]
* instructions see under [[Software/Assessment/20110830-S-A-MiniTOP#Minutes|Minutes meeting 2011-08-30]]
* test deployment needs to be continued by software testers
* Jubula documentation started: [[Software/Jubula]]
1. new proposal by Sven: Webdriver with Maven and Jenkins-CI
1. Jubula vs. Webdriver
1. testserver variants
1. testserver for manual tests
1. testserver of OS and application upgrades
1. testserver for CI
1. test methods
1. unit test
* test single modules, exceptions
1. integration tests
* test interaction of modules
1. system tests
* complete system test, with database interactions, module interactions and much more
* Updates?
1. Infrastructure seperation
* info from funkfeuer.at
* power input of dl blade server?
{{{
DL380G3-power calculation
Total System Input power requirement (W) 485 x1)
Total System Input measured (W) 265 Lo, 292 Hi
x1) source: http://h30099.www3.hp.com/configurator/calc/Power Calculator Catalog.xls
}}}
* proposal by mario:
* buy new machine: sample proposal alternate individual pieces: Euro 1042
. (1x Rasurbo BC-10, 1x Intel® DB65ALB3, 1x Intel® Core™ i7-2600, 4x Kingston ValueRAM DIMM 8 GB ECC, 2x Western Digital WD2002FAEX 2 TB)
* infos from meeting 2011-10-18
* other hosting providers
* hetzner: 50 euro server + setup 150 euro once + ip's: 22 euro
* funkfeuer: + ip's: unknown
* ip's needed: 24-30
* updates?
1. next meeting: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 22:00
== Minutes ==
1. pre-meeting disucssions
* T-Dose in 10 days, this or next week #976 should become active
* bug#827 needs pushed
* spam attacks
* 3 high prio topics: 976, 827, spam attack
1. [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=976|bug #976]] - database restructure preperation
* raw transcript from meeting results: [[https://bugs.cacert.org/file_download.php?file_id=245&type=bug|sql structure modifications as discussed within meeting]]
* New table to add: high potential domains to secure (mozilla blue print)
* proposed testserver deployment - when ?
* results from meeting 2011-10-18
* deletedwhen - to rename to deleted type datetime
* from - to rename to creatorid
* enum - or not enum for cca method
* add table "mozilla blue print" domains
* proposal michael: to add this as file, also to deploy to signer
* sql update? or php script?
* adding versioning number ? table verno, when type datetime
* new infos from this week:
* email addresses + domains verification on cert renewal: last verified (type datetime)
* info from dirk regarding CCA table structure. structure defined in [[https://lists.cacert.org/wws/arc/cacert-devel/2009-06/msg00004.html]]. Current definition to compare with structure definition from mid 2009
* Update?
* new modifications see above
* detailed discussion regarding CCA table
* comment field to name as method?
* type -> boolan
* adding version table
* latin-1 is db standard
* sql script will be prepared by Michael
1. [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=827|bug #827]] - New Points calculation / Thawte patch
1. [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=827|bug #827]] patch
|| Dirk, Michael || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=827|bug #827]] and [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=959|bug #959]] Thawte patch/Points-Count-Order-Change project || related bug 959: needs 1 more test, needs 2nd review / 2nd review: also check -x / tests done, needs 2nd review<
>959 {g} reviewed, deployed <
>827 {g} reviewed, deployment in 2 steps<
>deployed, report from Wytze || {g} <
> {0} ||
* dirk needs results from arbitration [[https://wiki.cacert.org/Arbitrations/a20100822.1|a20100822.1]] request to magu
* dirk sent update 2011-10-18: michael transfered to testserver
* michael: sql injection of one notary record: date < 30.8.2006, awarded=0, points=35
* test: 10.php: 35 points, 15.php shows 0 points => bug not fixed
* problem was reported by Hans, needs to be fixed: awarded = 0, points = 35, assurance date < 1.9.2006
* there still exist 2 notary table records for test purposes to check this bug
|| script || 10.php || 15.php || 43old || 43new ||
|| assuree's view<
>assurances received || 35 pts {g} || 35 pts {g} || 35 pts {g} || 35 pts {g} ||
|| assurer's view<
>assurances given || 35 pts {g} || 0 pts {r} || 35 pts {g} || 0 pts {r} ||
* problem awarded = 0, points = 35 -> assurances given wrong calculation
* dirk checks 15.php
* new patch by dirk, michael transfered to testserver, marcus tested: 15.php ok
* fix for 43.php needs to be fixed too
|| dirk || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=882|bug #882]] || display Assurance when field in list of assurances received, assurances given by a user in admin console interface<
>last update 2011-10-25 || {0} ||
* first test: ok
* new fix for bug#827
* addtl. test: ok
1. Spam attack
* analyze process by Michael, Marcus regarding contact form
* OTRS solution
1. [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=894|bug#894]] "Haeckchen bug" - review done, changes needs reviewed again
|| 3 || Dirk || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=894|bug#894]] assure someone patches (checkbox) || (incl wot.php changes)<
>tested by 2, needs 2nd review, deploy<
>new test round || {0} || ? / u1 / m1 ||
* review by dirk in session, review ok
* needs testing
1. CI (Update)
* sven did some work regarding frontendtest
* roles for users: new user, user with points, assurer, admin user
1. needs testing
* 985 translingo, needs 2nd test, eg mails, needs review
* 894 Haeckchen bug
* 827 new points count (15.php), needs review (-> Michael)
* 882 relates to 43.php
1. uli to trigger new testserver developer image
* new fixes: fixed git repository
* michael to enable/start ntpdaemon
1. [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=827|bug #827]] - New Points calculation / Thawte patch
1. PR work - Update?
1. newsletter mailing: ok from board [[https://community.cacert.org/board/motions.php?motion=m20111016.2|m20111016.2]] and [[https://community.cacert.org/board/motions.php?motion=m20111023.2|m20111023.2]]
1. newsletter reviewed English revision [[PR/News/NewPointsCalculation]]
1. translations in progress
1. script sql query to prepare based on events/oa mailing
* request for statement by critical team
* proposal by critical team:
a. to pace the email sending out a bit, e.g. by doing a chunk of 1000, then waiting 19 minutes (by a programmatic sleep) before starting the next chunk of 1000 etc
a. pushing out the whole mailing will take somewhere between one and two full days
a. reduce Postfix' maximal_queue_lifetime from the default 5 days to say 2 days
a. Basically [[Arbitrations/a20100309.1|a20100309.1]] already gives permission for this mailing, except that it outlines a somewhat different technical implementation of such mailings. But policy-wise there doesn't seem to be a difference to me with what we are proposing here, so why bother with addtl arbitration?
1. Software-Assessors / developers to prepare a sql-query that can handle above requirements, also to handle localy translateded text
* script to use from events + OA mailing, SA's to build a sql query, sending to critical team
1. Questions from last 5 meetings:
* dirk: when will 827 goes to production ?
==== Fixed Action Items since last or within meeting ====
|| uli, Michael || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=966|bug #966]] cancel doesn't cancel but processes instead || potential workaround to fix all "Cancel" requests available<
>addtl. individual fixes<
>last update 2011-08-30 || 3 times tested<
>ready to deploy?<
>some more tests after bug#824 removal || {g} || ||
|| uli<
>Done: Ted, Micael<
>!ToDo: Ted, dirk || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=846|bug #846]] Join Form restructure, help link || Better guidance of bonafide members in Join Form about Suffixes they doesn't have in their ID doxs (a20100207.2) || Michael added fixes, so 2nd review needed again<
>new update 2011-09-13, needs complete re-test || {g} || u5 / m4 ||
## || uli<
>Done: Ted, Micael<
>!ToDo: Ted, dirk || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=846|bug #846]] Join Form restructure, help link || Better guidance of bonafide members in Join Form about Suffixes they doesn't have in their ID doxs (a20100207.2)<
>Michael added fixes, so 2nd review needed again<
>2 tests, needs 2nd review, deploy || 3 {g} ||
## || uli, Michael || [[https://bugs.cacert.org/view.php?id=966|bug #966]] cancel doesn't cancel but processes instead || potential workaround to fix all "Cancel" requests available<
>addtl. individual fixes<
>new update 2011-08-30 || {g} ||
===== removed from action items list =====
|| Michael || CI (low priority), new eclipse version, test tool included, eg web applications, [[http://live.eclipse.org/node/1031|description to eclipse testpage]] (add to CI project?) || {0} ||
* still running test with jubula and a potential new system introduced by sven
----
==== Action Items New ====
|| uli || to trigger new testserver developer image || {0} ||
|| dirk, michael || mailing script for New points count project newsletter mailing || {0} ||
Action items: '''[[Software/Assessment/ActionItems|Meeting Action Items]]'''
<>
----
. CategorySoftwareAssessment