* Case Number: a20111230.1
  * Status: init
  * Claimants: Dominik G
  * Respondents: <anonymized>
  * Initial Case Manager: UlrichSchroeter, at 2016-12-08 EvaStöwe disclosed dispute based on DRO decision [[https://community.cacert.org/board/motions.php?motion=m20161119.4|m20161119.4]] and [[https://community.cacert.org/board/motions.php?motion=m20161119.3|m20161119.3]]
  * Case Manager: name case manager
  * Arbitrator: name arbitrator
  * Date of arbitration start: 201Y-MM-DD
  * Date of ruling: 201Y-MM-DD
  * Case closed: 201Y-MM-DD
  * Complaint: Dispute filing about Junior Member

  * Relief: TBD

Before: Arbitrator name arbitor (A), Respondent: <anonymized> (R), Claimant: Dominik G (C), Case: a20111230.1


== History Log ==
 . 2011-12-30 (issue.c.o) case [s20111230.47]
 . 2012-01-02 (iCM): added to wiki, request for CM / A

== Original Dispute, Discovery (Private Part) ==

 * Link to Arbitration case [[Arbitrations/priv/a20111230.1|a20111230.1 (Private Part)]]

<<Include(Arbitrations/priv/a20111230.1)>>  


==== EOT Private Part ====

== Original Dispute ==
{{{
> Dear support,
>
> please file dispute againt the CAcert community for the following case.
>
> On 2011-12-29, I met [member] on the 28c3 in a
> co-audit session. In the mutual assurance, I noticed that he is a
> Junior member (and Junior assurer).
>
> I asked for the necessary parental consent which he couldn't provide.
> Further investigations brought up the following facts:
>
> - the member is fully assured by more than 3 assurers
> - at least one of these assurers must be considered experienced, if not
>   senior
> - the member has already assured ~ 15 people (and noticed the implied
>   10 points upper boundary)
> - the member has never heard of PoJAM or the parental consent form
>   before and was never asked for it during an assurance
> - all this took place in 2011 when PoJAM was in POLICY state!
>
>
> Obviuosly, this is not the Juniors fault and besides that, we cannot
> get him into arbitration anyway (that's why we enforce PoJAM !). So the
> case should be filed against the community to have an Arbitrator ask
> support for the assurers of the Junior and brief them about the
> consequences their ignorance of policy documents can have.
>
>
> Basic details of the Junior Member:
>
> Name: [members name]
> DoB: [members DoB]
> E-Mail: [members e-mail]
>
>
> Evidence for the arbitration was gathered by the following experienced
> and senior assurers:
>
> - myself
> - [AS1] ([email])
> - [AS2] ([email])
>
>
> Of course, I accept CCA and DRP under this arbitration.
>
> 2011-12-30, CARS
>
> --
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
> With kind regards,
>
> Dominik G[...]
}}}

Parts in [] anonymised by EvaStöwe for possible privacy reasons at time of publishing dispute. This may be adjusted by later CM or Arbitrator

== Discovery ==

== Ruling ==

== Execution ==

== Similiar Cases ==
|| [[Arbitrations/a20100131.1|a20100131.1]] || [[Arbitrations/a20100131.1|User wishes Account removal (PoJAM case)]] ||


----
 . CategoryArbitration
 . CategoryArbCaseOtherAssurerErrors